cjvanlissa
worcs or WORCS?
The package is currently referred to as worcs (all lowercase as it is common with R packages). In the manuscript title, the approach is referred to as WORCS (all uppercase). Is this difference intended?
Yes, the name is an acronym, and as such, should be in upper case. The package name is in lower case, which is the convention (https://alexandereckert.com/post/r-package-names/r-package-names/), I believe because before you install a package, you don't know which letters are capitalized. This distinction also helps clarify when we're talking about the workflow vs the software.
Maybe to make this distinction more pronounced format the package as code, so it is WORCS (the approach) vs worcs (the package)?
Yes, in the package I've tried to do that. The paper doens't really mention the package much yet, so I will check