rfcs

rfcs copied to clipboard

Debugging support in Wasmtime

4

> Implement guest debugging capabilities in Wasmtime and integrate those abilities with surrounding debugging toolchains. ### [Rendered](https://github.com/elliottt/rfcs/blob/trevor/wasmtime-debugging/accepted/wasmtime-debugging.md) Co-authored-by: Nick Fitzgerald - @fitzgen Co-authored-by: Rainy Sinclair - @itsrainy

elliottt

Hello! 👋 Not really sure where to recommend this or whether there's a formal procedure or what. I just wanted to pose the idea that @bytecodealliance should have a .github...

jcbhmr

Number each RFC file by the PR number it was introduced in

4

Implements #23 by prefixing each RFC file with its associated PR number.

esoterra

RFC: WIT-Bindgen Versioning and Release Process

1

This RFC proposes a versioning policy and release process for the [wit-bindgen](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen) project built around *Release PRs* where a *Release Lead* updates changelogs and generates new version numbers for each...

esoterra

Number RFCs by order of proposal

2

Assign each RFC a number in order of when it was proposed that is put as the beginning of the file name e.g. `000-rfc-process.md`. * Users will be able to...

esoterra

Define a process for resolving disagreements among stakeholders for the RFC process

1

Over in #1, @joshtriplett [highlighted](1#issuecomment-731364357) that we haven't yet defined a process for resolving conflicts that might otherwise leave RFCs in limbo indefinitely. We shouldn't put this off for too...

tschneidereit

Over in #1, @ggreif [highlighted](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/rfcs/pull/1#discussion_r527914943) that the RFC template doesn't include a section on risk assessment: > Should a proposal address some pain point, at the cost of potentially introducing...

tschneidereit

Implementing the exception handling proposal in Wasmtime

17

This RFC proposes to implement the [exception handling](https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling) proposal in Wasmtime. At the time of writing, exception handling is a phase 4 proposal. I think there are lots of details...

dhil

Add "A Cranelift Assembler"

2

[Rendered](https://github.com/abrown/bytecodealliance-rfcs/blob/cranelift-assembler/accepted/cranelift-assembler.md)

abrown

Add support for the Component Model [Async ABI](https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/design/mvp/Async.md) to `wasm-tools`, `wit-bindgen`, and `wasmtime`. [Rendered RFC](https://github.com/dicej/rfcs/blob/component-async/accepted/component-model-async.md)

dicej