Rework on #109
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
-
Modernize Python code to support versions 3.9-3.12
-
Replace deprecated
datetime.utcnow()with timezone-aware alternative -
Update string formatting to use f-strings
-
Remove Python 2 compatibility code
Changes diagram
flowchart LR
A["Python 2/3 compatibility code"] --> B["Python 3.9+ only code"]
C["datetime.utcnow()"] --> D["datetime.now(timezone.utc)"]
E["String format()"] --> F["f-strings"]
G["super(Class, self)"] --> H["super()"]
Changes walkthrough 📝
| Relevant files | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhancement | 6 files
| ||||||||||||||||
| Formatting | 8 files
| ||||||||||||||||
| Bug fix | |||||||||||||||||
| Dependencies | 1 files
|
Need help?
Type /help how to ...in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.Check out the documentation for more information.
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪ |
| 🧪 No relevant tests |
| 🔒 No security concerns identified |
⚡ Recommended focus areas for reviewLogic Error
io_open is now assigned but io.open is no longer used, which will cause a NameError when Python version is not 3. |
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
| Category | Suggestion | Impact |
| General |
Fix timezone-aware epoch calculationThe epoch calculation should use UTC timezone consistently. The current
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3__ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a positive change in the PR but offers no new improvement, as the | Low |
Verify timezone consistency across codebaseUsing tests-performance/benmark_micro.py [5]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3__ Why: This suggestion correctly affirms the PR's change but only advises verifying consistency, which is a general good practice rather than a specific, actionable code improvement. | Low | |
| ||
I'm actually surprised that on the surface level the gemini code review looks rather sensible.
@mavwolverine Do these suggestions by the AI make sense to you?
I'm actually surprised that on the surface level the gemini code review looks rather sensible.
Yes, I was surprised too. How did you add it? Thanks
@mavwolverine Do these suggestions by the AI make sense to you?
Yes, the suggestions do make sense, and it has covered areas I did not touch just based on the commit message. That is great!
One thing I am unsure on is the timezone change https://github.com/bobbui/json-logging-python/pull/111#discussion_r2202918092
It is suggesting "The most direct fix would be to remove .replace(tzinfo=None) in formatters.py", but it seems to be something added recently. So not sure on that.
Updated PR for other 2 suggestions
@mavwolverine actually I didn't. I am pretty sure @bobbui did that. (Thanks for that @bobbui!).
It is suggesting "The most direct fix would be to remove .replace(tzinfo=None) in formatters.py", but it seems to be something added recently. So not sure on that.
Well, that was introduced to work around python 3.12 deprecations. Looking at the other function this calls iso_time_format that already appends a Z to the timestamp to mark it as ZULU/UTC, so the suggestion of gemini seems sensible for me?
Friendly ping @mavwolverine - did you notice the feedback I gave you?