Tierney Cyren
Tierney Cyren
One question for clarification: This RFCs repo has historically been mostly focused on the CLI. Is this RFC for the implementation of this functionality in the CLI or for implementation...
@MylesBorins should we expect discussion time set aside in the npm CLI RFC meeting, a separate synchronous meeting, or no synchronous meeting to discuss?
+1 to this behind a flag.
> It would be great to have Tab Completion on quires! [Should that also be an RFC in itself?] I would expect this to be a follow-up RFC and not...
@ljharb I was intentionally vague in values. Once you allow `MIT` and a few others, you've allowed a majority of the ecosystem. For a few that have incorrect or missing...
@ljharb this is the structure: ``` "allow": ["MIT", "ISC"], // licenses that are allowed "block": ["Unlicense", "WTFPL"], // these are not allowed "ignore": { // these will all be ignored...
@ljharb would this work for you? ``` "allow": ["MIT", "ISC"], // licenses that are allowed "block": ["Unlicense", "WTFPL"], // these are not allowed "ignore": { // these will all be...
If folks would like me to rewrite this with the licensee format, that's fine. I would prefer to get more input that it's the direction folks would want to go...
@isaacs would genuinely appreciate your feedback on this in text, if you have any, before I start editing so I can make sure I don't miss anything - I know...
@ruyadorno it would be nice to hear expanded thoughts on that. Do the project's maintainers want to use the JSON format of licensee? Literally just pull in Licensee as a...