Unable to get rpc data
Steps to reproduce
Using python,
self._client = Client()
self._client.eth.block_number()
>>> Network might be unstable, try again later.
Reason: b'cannot use a string pattern on a bytes-like object'
Digging in, it looks like it is trying to use json.loads() on a bytes value of a boolean.rpc_api.py, line 142 returns the bytes boolean from response.value and runtime.py trys to call json.loads() on it. I am not sure by observing the data what is supposed to be happening.
Expected behavior
I should get a dict response representing the json-rpc data
Actual behavior
It errors
System configuration
Incubed version
3.3.2
Request
I have tried block_numer() and gas_price()
Incubed Configuration
default
Chain
mainnet and goerli
Hello @unparalleled-js
Thank you for reporting (and debugging). I will try to run some tests here and see what that is about.
Hello again @unparalleled-js
So what was happening was that in the python transport we were getting the method (http verb) to fill in the dictionary as a byte array (or uint8*).
request_params = {
'url': str(in3_request.url_at(i), 'utf8'),
'method': str(in3_request.method(), 'utf8'),
'data': in3_request.payload(),
'headers': {'Content-type': 'application/json', 'Accept': 'application/json'},
}
The problem is that internally urllib expect that to be a string. There is a method validator somewhere within the package that uses a regex to validate it (possibly to check if it is a valid http verb). Since it was an array of byte, itd blow up on the invoke of urllib.request.urlopen(request, timeout=timeout). The solution for that was changing the code above to
request_params = {
'url': str(in3_request.url_at(i), 'utf8'),
'method': str(in3_request.method(), 'utf8'),
'data': str(in3_request.payload(), 'utf8'),
'headers': {'Content-type': 'application/json', 'Accept': 'application/json'},
}
In general, id prefer to have it as a const char* from the c but changing those native types can be challenge on the binding because of garbage collection, pointer disposal etc. So yea, if you are relying on that fix you could use the transport class as:
import urllib.parse
import urllib.request
from in3.exception import TransportException
from in3.libin3.transport import In3Request, In3Response
def https_transport(in3_request: In3Request, in3_response: In3Response):
for i in range(0, in3_request.urls_len()):
try:
request_params = {
'url': str(in3_request.url_at(i), 'utf8'),
'method': str(in3_request.method(), 'utf8'),
'data': in3_request.payload(),
'headers': {'Content-type': 'application/json', 'Accept': 'application/json'},
}
request = urllib.request.Request(**request_params)
timeout = 180000
with urllib.request.urlopen(request, timeout=timeout) as response:
if not response.status == 200:
raise TransportException('Request failed with status: {}'.format(str(response.status)))
msg = response.read()
in3_response.success(i, msg)
except Exception as err:
in3_response.failure(i, str(err).encode('utf8'))
return 0
and set it as the transport function in the Client creation. Since we are wrapping up the btc signers, the fix will be pushed in the same release. I believe this regression was introduced as a consequence of the zksync wallet.