glyphy icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
glyphy copied to clipboard

what should demo look like?

Open themaddoctor opened this issue 8 years ago • 15 comments

What should the demo look like? I can see no discernible text in it. Just lines tightly packed together. Is this how it /should/ look?

themaddoctor avatar Jan 17 '18 04:01 themaddoctor

It should kinda look like this: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=62080

behdad avatar Jan 17 '18 22:01 behdad

Then it failed utterly on my system.

themaddoctor avatar Jan 17 '18 23:01 themaddoctor

What platform / driver?

behdad avatar Jan 17 '18 23:01 behdad

linux 64-bit, gcc 7.1.0 glibc 2.26. Not sure what you mean by driver, unless you mean nouveau of kernel 4.14.2

themaddoctor avatar Jan 18 '18 03:01 themaddoctor

This is what it looks like for me:

glyphydemo

themaddoctor avatar Jan 18 '18 22:01 themaddoctor

Humm. That's the most corrupt I've seen the demo perform! No idea where to go from here.

behdad avatar Jan 19 '18 19:01 behdad

Maybe I'm missing the font that you use?

themaddoctor avatar Jan 19 '18 19:01 themaddoctor

I'm hoping to get this resolved before I build libreoffice

themaddoctor avatar Jan 19 '18 23:01 themaddoctor

Maybe I'm missing the font that you use?

No, there's no way you should get what you are getting.

I'm hoping to get this resolved before I build libreoffice

Oh, does libreoffice use GLyphy after all? I thought that was abandoned.

behdad avatar Jan 19 '18 23:01 behdad

I don't really know, except to say that the BLFS (beyond linux from scratch) book says that glyphy is optional for LO.

What can I do to help narrow down the cause?

themaddoctor avatar Jan 20 '18 02:01 themaddoctor

If you just want to move on with building your system, just skip GLyphy. It's not a strict requirement of anything.

behdad avatar Jan 20 '18 02:01 behdad

I understand that, but it sounds like a neat thing to have. The way my system is rendering fonts now seems a little off (they look clearer is some areas than others, probably due to where the pixels are relative to the glyphs. I'm not explaining it well.)

themaddoctor avatar Jan 20 '18 02:01 themaddoctor

Anyway, you were right, and the BLFS book was wrong. LO did NOT want to include glyphy.

themaddoctor avatar Jan 25 '18 04:01 themaddoctor

This is what it looks like for me:

glyphydemo

this could be a incorrect font file? eg https://github.com/behdad/glyphy/issues/37

mgood7123 avatar Oct 29 '21 05:10 mgood7123

FWIW Here's what it looks like as of today in Mint 21.1 (Ubuntu 22.04) ksnip_20230705-093319

13rac1 avatar Jul 05 '23 16:07 13rac1