bbhtt

Looks like appstream 1.1.0 switched libyaml with libfyaml (I've never heard of the latter). I guess this means >=1.1.0 will not reach Ubuntu 24.04?

Can you please rebase this?

relatedly, this is another case of duplicate groups that needs investigation: ``` flatpak info -m runtime/org.kde.Platform/x86_64/6.9 ... [Build] built-extensions=org.kde.Sdk.Locale;org.kde.Sdk.Debug;org.kde.Sdk.Docs; [Extension org.kde.Platform.Locale] directory=share/runtime/locale autodelete=true locale-subset=true [Build] built-extensions=org.kde.Platform.Locale; ``` the resultant metadata...

The relevant code is here https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder/blob/c2c03c4c778f4d9e8586be7a0a0222a71f0cfa67/src/builder-manifest.c#L3390-L3502 We need to be a bit sensible here, some of these should be merged together (second example), and some should never allow duplicate group...

Is this ready or not? If so you have to rebase and undraft. Also format it https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder-tools/blob/master/pip/readme.md#development I think adding extra metadata to JSON is fine.

I don't have an opinion about the key name, either works I think. It's going to be generated anyways.

Instead of hiding, a better solution is to show a small summary by default, see https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/6036 which seems stalled. The meta issue for these warnings is https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/3531

> Thank you for this! I might be pushing my luck here but maybe we just show a general warning "Some applications, runtimes or extensions might EOL, for more information,...

> In the meantime would it be possible to print a clearer error message when a user try to compile sources for a yarn v3 lockfile please? e.g. Lockfiles generated...

This is not an issue in Flatpak unless you have something specific. You need `--device=all` and you also may need to install certain udev rules sometimes. Eg. steam comes with...