Ben Ashbaugh

@pjaaskel might want to have a look at this one...

Merging as discussed in the December 2nd teleconference.

Discussed in the February 11th teleconference: - Eliminating direct application access to the command buffer state may lead to more efficient implementations. - If we removed direct application access to...

Recording a possibly related thought: We currently have an error condition for [clEnqueueCommandBufferKHR](https://registry.khronos.org/OpenCL/specs/3.0-unified/html/OpenCL_API.html#clEnqueueCommandBufferKHR) that refers to the pending state: > [CL_INVALID_OPERATION](https://registry.khronos.org/OpenCL/specs/3.0-unified/html/OpenCL_API.html#CL_INVALID_OPERATION) if command_buffer was not created with the [CL_COMMAND_BUFFER_SIMULTANEOUS_USE_KHR](https://registry.khronos.org/OpenCL/specs/3.0-unified/html/OpenCL_API.html#CL_COMMAND_BUFFER_SIMULTANEOUS_USE_KHR) flag...

Removing "focused review" temporarily. We will re-add after #2300 is merged.

I think this question is in reference to https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-CTS/pull/2231#discussion_r1960998417 - is that correct? If so, note that replying to review comments tends to thread better, and then we can resolve...

Merging as discussed in the June 10th teleconference.

Hi, this project uses sub-modules for the OpenCL external dependencies. Can you please follow the instructions here? https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-SDK?tab=readme-ov-file#dependencies I see though that the README has the incorrect paths to these...

Is there more to do here, or can this be closed?

Closing as discussed in the June 3rd teleconference.