Latest update [2.232.2] introduces MLFlow
Describe the bug The latest update to the SageMaker SDK introduces sagemaker-mlflow which then brings in a constellation of dependencies that users might not need. This is a minor change (https://github.com/aws/sagemaker-python-sdk/compare/v2.232.1...v2.232.2) that leads to installing 30 new dependencies.
To reproduce
Install the latest update, pip install sagemaker==2.232.2.
Expected behavior
I would have liked if this release had been included via Python "extras" where you can specify an additional set of installation requirements. For example, rather than installing sagemaker-mlflow automatically, only install it if someone specifies `pip install "sagemaker[mlflow]>=2.232.2".
Screenshots or logs If applicable, add screenshots or logs to help explain your problem.
System information A description of your system. Please provide:
- SageMaker Python SDK version: 2.232.2
- Framework name (eg. PyTorch) or algorithm (eg. KMeans): N/A
- Framework version: N/A
- Python version: N/A
- CPU or GPU: N/A
- Custom Docker image (Y/N): N
Additional context The package could be more usable and leaner if it implemented this as a Python "extra".
I also ran into this when a deploy failed unexpectedly. Looks like there was a request to make it optional that wasn't addressed before merge - https://github.com/aws/sagemaker-python-sdk/pull/4880#discussion_r1784907626
Edit: mlflow actually puts us over the lambda max deployment size so I'll need to avoid this version entirely until this is made optional
https://github.com/aws/sagemaker-python-sdk/pull/4903 open for review
Hi @mathcass, thanks for reaching out about this. We have merged the fix in this PR - https://github.com/aws/sagemaker-python-sdk/pull/4903
Should hopefully be resolved on next release
hey can confirm, this is fixed in v2.234.0+
thank you!!
Closing since has been resolved in this PR - https://github.com/aws/sagemaker-python-sdk/pull/4903
I saw this but I'm late to coming back to comment on it. Thank you so much for addressing and responding to the issue @ryansteakley & @benieric. I appreciate you.