Audrow Nash
Audrow Nash
Hi @Ian118, I see that the packages have license files, but would you add a top-level license file?
FYI @MiguelCompany and @EduPonz
@peterborkuti, should the existing template be removed in this PR? Also, make sure the DCO check passes. After these, we should be able to get this in.
It's not clear to me what the best thing to do here is. I'm going to backlog this issue for now. We will probably have discussions about how this should...
@mhidalgo-bdai, why was this reopened?
I'm going to mark this as backlog. It's not 100% clear to me what the right behavior is here. What did we do in ROS 1? There also may be...
I've added this to discuss to the next ROS 2 PMC meeting.
We normally don't modify EOL distros. I think removing a package may be an exception. I've asked in the OSRF slack.
I'm going to close this. Feel free to reopen, if there's interest.
I know this is on my plate, but I'll close this, because it is probably out of sync with what we're doing now.