Aregtech

Hi @johnnyhuziqin , OK. Thank you for useful information. Right now preparing an example for latency benchmark. When it is ready, I'll ask kindly to run test on your system...

@kevinxusf and @johnnyhuziqin Here is the current status of the latency improvements: 1. Several optimizations were implemented in message delivery / dispatching and thread locking. 2. A new example, `30_publatency`,...

Thank you @johnnyhuziqin , I think it looks very good. In majority of cases (~95%) the request-response (ping-pong case) is under 100us. In the second table, since you have pushed...

@johnnyhuziqin and @kevinxusf , The `master` branch has significant latency and throughput improvements. I'd appreciate if you could run the benchmark app `30_publatency` and share your results. --- **What changed...

@johnnyhuziqin and @kevinxusf, I've published a latency benchmark document [Areg SDK Performance Benchmarks](https://github.com/aregtech/areg-sdk/blob/master/docs/wiki/08b-areg-sdk-performance-benchmarks.md) Results on Linux Ubuntu 26.04 LTS (i7-13700H, 32 GB DDR4): - RTT (round-trip time): ~35 µs -...

@kevinxusf and @kevinxusf I would say that the final changes / optimizations are done. What changed: less heap allocation, use queue ring, a few bug fixes. To compare with other...

@johnnyhuziqin , Thank you for reporting the issue. I agree that the code generator should provide clearer and more informative error messages. At minimum, it should have a validation /...

@collinshields , just dropping a message to inform that I did not ignore your modification. We'll come back to this topic after I merge the refactoring with the `master` branch,...

@apoorvdarshan thank you very much for this PR. I'll check and merge. But it will take a little time, because right now we are busy with big refactoring tasks.

Thank you @Nataponni , Could you please have a look at workflow failure. Please don't hesitate to ask questions if something is unclear. In the PR validation you need to...