[ISSUE #7263& ISSUE #7264] Fix to cleanup consumption offset data or topic consumerqueue on the standby node when execute command 'deleteSubGroup' or 'deleteTopic'
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes
Fixes #7263 and #7264
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Codecov Report
Merging #7273 (5aea257) into develop (b4f73e2) will increase coverage by
0.00%. The diff coverage is0.00%.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #7273 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 42.62% 42.62%
+ Complexity 9414 9413 -1
==========================================
Files 1152 1152
Lines 82355 82358 +3
Branches 10723 10723
==========================================
+ Hits 35100 35105 +5
- Misses 42874 42876 +2
+ Partials 4381 4377 -4
| Files Changed | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| ...apache/rocketmq/broker/slave/SlaveSynchronize.java | 4.08% <0.00%> (-0.09%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
lgtm
this bothers me too. I copy master's consumerqueue data to slave and restart slave to fix
seek for integration
I think the title might be too long, suggest renaming
[ISSUE xx& ISSUE xxx] Fix: xxx
@ joeCarf It's been changed. Please submit it,Thanks
I think the title might be too long, suggest renaming
[ISSUE xx& ISSUE xxx] Fix: xxx@ joeCarf It's been changed. Please submit it,Thanks
still too long, maybe this?
[ISSUE #7263& ISSUE #7264] consumption offset data and topic consumerqueue not deleted on the standby node
I think the title might be too long, suggest renaming
[ISSUE xx& ISSUE xxx] Fix: xxx@ joeCarf It's been changed. Please submit it,Thanks
still too long, maybe this?
[ISSUE #7263& ISSUE #7264] consumption offset data and topic consumerqueue not deleted on the standby node
has changed
I think the title might be too long, suggest renaming
[ISSUE xx& ISSUE xxx] Fix: xxx
@joeCarf seek for integration
Begging to join
@mxsm @Oliverwqcwrw Help to integrate the code.
lgtm