[Feature](network interface) Support network interface

[ZashJie]

Proposed changes

Support network_interface in Apache Doris, the main changes are:

1. If network_interface is configured in the configuration file, use network_interface configuration

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem summary

Describe your changes.

Checklist(Required)

1. Does it affect the original behavior:
   • [ ] Yes
   • [x] No
   • [ ] I don't know
2. Has unit tests been added:
   • [ ] Yes
   • [x] No
   • [ ] No Need
3. Has document been added or modified:
   • [ ] Yes
   • [x] No
   • [ ] No Need
4. Does it need to update dependencies:
   • [x] Yes
   • [ ] No
5. Are there any changes that cannot be rolled back:
   • [ ] Yes (If Yes, please explain WHY)
   • [x] No

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at [email protected] by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

[github-actions[bot]]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"

[hf200012]

title style ：[<type>](<scope>) <subject> https://doris.apache.org/zh-CN/community/how-to-contribute/commit-format-specification @ZashJie

[github-actions[bot]]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"

[morningman]

Please amend your PR title and add describe in your PR comment. And I suggest to wait #14063 merge

[github-actions[bot]]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"

[github-actions[bot]]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"

[github-actions[bot]]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"

[github-actions[bot]]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"

[github-actions[bot]]

We're closing this PR because it hasn't been updated in a while. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you'd like to revive this PR, please reopen it and feel free a maintainer to remove the Stale tag!