Bloom filter Join Step I: create benchmark
Which issue does this PR close?
part of #7955
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?
Marking as draft as I think this PR is no longer waiting on feedback. Please mark it as ready for review when it is ready for another look
for TPCH query 17, when we create 1000000 rows for lineitem and part table, the time spent on join is 50% (the other 80% of time spent on creating parquet files)
For the second case, 95% of the time spent on join
I think it worth a try to implement join predicate pushdown
I suggest we revive this PR as it seems to have gotten lost / not reviewed 😢
I suggest we revive this PR as it seems to have gotten lost / not reviewed 😢
I am still working on the implementation of actual join_pushdown, I'll push a complete PR once it is done
I suggest we revive this PR as it seems to have gotten lost / not reviewed 😢
I am still working on the implementation of actual "hash_join build side statistic pushdown", I'll push a complete PR once it is done
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.