apache
Extensions Framework & Orchestrate Anything
Description
Apache CloudStack already supports a wide range of hypervisors, including KVM, VMware, and Xen, to provision and manage instances. We are now introducing a new feature or framework that allows seamless integration of "external" provisioning systems into CloudStack. For example, this enables the integration of any baremetal provisioning system, platforms like Proxmox, or even the addition of new hypervisor support through the use of simple scripts.
A design document is made with more details at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/External+Deployment+Integration+in+CloudStack
Documentation PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/523
Types of changes
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
- [ ] Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
- [ ] build/CI
- [ ] test (unit or integration test code)
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
- [x] Major
- [ ] Minor
Codecov Report
:x: Patch coverage is 44.76840% with 2349 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 17.00%. Comparing base (217ff27) to head (d673742).
:warning: Report is 115 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9752 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 16.76% 17.00% +0.23%
- Complexity 14281 14718 +437
============================================
Files 5767 5832 +65
Lines 512657 517561 +4904
Branches 62359 62982 +623
============================================
+ Hits 85941 87988 +2047
- Misses 417118 419640 +2522
- Partials 9598 9933 +335
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| uitests | 3.82% <ø> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
| unittests | 17.95% <44.76%> (+0.26%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
![codecov[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/254?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11530
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11592
@DaanHoogland I see many other custom detail parameters in a few other APIs, such as vnfdetails, domaindetails, accountdetails, and a few more.
In this case, I would like to keep this as a separate parameter because these are the only details that are important if the hypervisor type is External. The other parameters are just meant to fit into CloudStack's workflow. The core purpose of this feature is to send these external details to the external provisioner.
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
@harikrishna-patnala can you resolve the conflicts ? thanks
btw: is there an example script for proxmox ?
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12909
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12917
@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12930
@abh1sar a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12938
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.
@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13218
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.