server: fix nfs version option during mounts
Description
Fixes #9469
Types of changes
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
- [ ] Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
- [ ] build/CI
- [ ] test (unit or integration test code)
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
- [ ] Major
- [ ] Minor
Bug Severity
- [ ] BLOCKER
- [ ] Critical
- [ ] Major
- [ ] Minor
- [ ] Trivial
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 15.08%. Comparing base (
b4325ec) to head (3445407). Report is 35 commits behind head on 4.19.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #9559 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 15.08% 15.08% -0.01%
- Complexity 11185 11187 +2
============================================
Files 5406 5406
Lines 473123 473143 +20
Branches 61313 60436 -877
============================================
- Hits 71378 71374 -4
- Misses 393805 393828 +23
- Partials 7940 7941 +1
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| uitests | 4.30% <ø> (ø) |
|
| unittests | 15.80% <0.00%> (-0.01%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@blueorangutan package
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10743
@blueorangutan package
@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10867
@blueorangutan package
@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10926
@blueorangutan test
@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11312) Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8 Total time taken: 47686 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9559-t11312-kvm-ol8.zip Smoke tests completed. 132 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
| Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File |
|---|---|---|---|
| test_01_secure_vm_migration | Error |
134.49 | test_vm_life_cycle.py |
| test_01_secure_vm_migration | Error |
134.49 | test_vm_life_cycle.py |
@blueorangutan package
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11029
@blueorangutan test
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11401) Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8 Total time taken: 47750 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9559-t11401-kvm-ol8.zip Smoke tests completed. 132 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
| Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File |
|---|---|---|---|
| test_03_secured_to_nonsecured_vm_migration | Error |
393.96 | test_vm_life_cycle.py |
@JoaoJandre this looks like a good to have for 4.20 (and 4.19) can you concur?
@JoaoJandre this looks like a good to have for 4.20 (and 4.19) can you concur?
@DaanHoogland yes but it seems that no one tested the PR (yet). If we can get some manual tests on it before the freeze I think it should be in 4.20
@JoaoJandre this looks like a good to have for 4.20 (and 4.19) can you concur?
@DaanHoogland yes but it seems that no one tested the PR (yet). If we can get some manual tests on it before the freeze I think it should be in 4.20
trying to fit it in @JoaoJandre ;)
@JoaoJandre this looks like a good to have for 4.20 (and 4.19) can you concur?
@DaanHoogland yes but it seems that no one tested the PR (yet). If we can get some manual tests on it before the freeze I think it should be in 4.20
trying to fit it in @JoaoJandre ;)
This got a bit behind in priority, need to create an env that doesn't support nfsv3 to do a functional test.
Tested according to the initial issue:
- registering a template as system vm works and
- retrieving diagnostics data as well!