andreoss
andreoss
Related to https://github.com/objectionary/eo/issues/1109
@yegor256 Taken.
@yegor256 This is not yet complete The following PMD checks still don't pass: 1) 112 Only field initialization or call to other constructors in a constructor. (ConstructorOnlyInitializesOrCallOtherConstructors) The code heavily...
@yegor256 To to my knowledge, qulice does not allow disabling a certain rule, without using annotations. There was a similar problem in cactoos https://github.com/yegor256/qulice/issues/1075
@yegor256 Ready to take this.
@yegor256 Instead of dividing methods into `static` or `instance`, we could treat `new` as a method. ``` ((java "String").call "new" 65-66-67).as-string (((java "Random").call "new).call "nextBoolean").as-bool ``` Same would go for...
@yegor256 Should there be some mechanism which intersects calls to missing attributes? Like `method_missing` ``` [] > foo [attr] > missing foo.bar # calls `foo.missing "bar"` ' ```
@yegor256 Is it still in scope?
@yegor256 @Graur I want to continue to work on this issue, any objections?