Andrzej Giniewicz

I think https://github.com/ajhager/libgdx-sbt-project.g8/issues/59 will be of tremendous help here. It would allow us to largely separate IDE issues and template generating issues from this template itself. Also, if libgdx-sbt was...

Also, hmm... if we had https://github.com/ajhager/libgdx-sbt-project.g8/issues/48 we could just zip empty project and people could configure it there, it would remove the need to use g8, conscript and git if...

How about publishing zipped snapshots of already generated template (with defaults)?

at least I think it's lot simpler than Activator template, which would be totally different animal.

I've rebased this to keep it cleaner.

I wonder, have you tested https://github.com/pfn/android-sdk-plugin ? It seems to be gaining momentum recently and has some features we wait for in plugin we use right now, like sbt 0.13...

No matter if we move or not, I've just checked that with current plugin it is impossible. Almost every file in android-plugin imports AndroidPlugin._, which contains settings field checking for...

with new template it still complains about it... I think we need to ask upstream about it. ``` [error] set ANDROID_HOME or run 'android update project -p ...' ```

I think that this includes: - https://github.com/ajhager/libgdx-sbt-project.g8/issues/77 - documenting AndroidManifest.xml setup - https://github.com/ajhager/libgdx-sbt-project.g8/issues/56 - adding custom dependencies like freetype or bullet

> the adapter architecture that's used by the smart-embed-model module supports adding those platforms with relative ease Thanks for reply! Is this part already supported, i.e. a pull request to...