Antoine Eddi
Antoine Eddi
Applied the changes you asked me @moul during our one-on-one chat.
So to the summarize, the main benefits are: - it makes the project seem more serious for a project of Gno's scale - It allows for decoupling the import from...
@moul @zivkovicmilos The tests are working now. Do we only authorize govdao members (or even only members of a specific tier) to: 1. Create a payment proposal (https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/4374/files#diff-3a2d1baf6d57fe1d2380abbaea30f64e29eb17ec13dab348d79e205e11f984edR146) 2. Vote...
> @moul @zivkovicmilos The tests are working now. Do we only authorize govdao members (or even only members of a specific tier) to: > > 1. Create a payment proposal ...
That sounds really interesting to work on. 👍 I could maybe bootstrap a base on which to iterate over time to add features.
Thanks! 👍 Indeed, as the functionalities of the bot will overlap with those of CODEOWNERS, it seems logical to disable it (or replace it with the bot's config file).
I feel that for this kind of opinionated rules it would make sense to group them under a single 'official' linter and to document them in the monorepo (to explain...
Sounds like a good place to plug you in for the linter, but I’m not an expert at all, Morgan will have a much more informed opinion. A few thoughts...
Thank you @costinberty :) FYI, it was just a suggestion, no worries if we merge without it.