Adamansky Anton
Adamansky Anton
@DavidKorczynski > I was wondering if there were updates on this? If you would like for the Ejdb to be fuzzed we would be happy to put more efforts into...
Hi @kennycarruthers! Sure currently its not possibly to get record without copying, will try to add some handy api this week.
Hi! We have moved to ejdb2, it has completely different codebase. So have to write again many language bindings, and need time to do it. Currently the following bindings implemented:...
Thank you so much for your efforts! Anyway I have quite limited access to windows - ejdb win builds tested using wine runner :) I will try to resolve static...
I see you have patched cmake build scripts, trying to find clean solution
Was busy last month will try to get time next week
Sure! Some work was done by one of our contributor https://gitlab.com/bemyak/ejdb2-rs But we are still finding good ways to start. So any contributions are appreciated, especially for Rust, since it...
Thank you so much! I will respond to your comment and set ref to your bind in few days
I'm sorry for the long delay (= I've listed this binding in the project README. > I also find it inconvenient that EJDB doesn't support operators on the primary key...
Hi Andre! Yes, joins are only supported against document ids. This case is implemented in relatively simple manner and this is a strong point I think. Doing joins against arbitrary...