Please add respect foot=use_sidepath for pedestrian routes

[maciejs]

According to OSM Wiki,

Unlike bicycle=use_sidepath, this tag was never properly proposed and accepted. Due to its considerable use however (often in combination with bicycle=use_sidepath), routing engines should treat it as a negative access value (i.e., equivalent to foot=no or a bit weaker) to prevent pedestrian users from being routed along ways with parallel compulsory sidepaths.

Currently, however, a profile such as hiking-mountain.brf does not respect this value.

[afischerdev]

Do you have an example for that?

[maciejs]

https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=19/50.13740/19.39749/standard&lonlats=19.396266,50.137436;19.397892,50.137288&profile=hiking-mountain

[afischerdev]

@maciejs Great, thanks

[polyscias]

As indicated in #745 and #746, I think it is better to use 100 instead of 10000 for foot=use_sidepath, that works also fine:

[maciejs]

@polyscias Thank you for your suggestion, I have updated the value