Question in paper: For ablation study "Compare ControlNet and LAControlNet"
Hi, I have a question in paper. May I ask a question
In the ablation study of "Compare ControlNet and LAControlNet". Figure7(c), the w/ ControlNet result is trained from scratch based on ControlNet architecture and proposed dataset? Or using the pretrained ControlNet weights ?
After scanning from model weights released in ControlNet, those are trained on specific conditions (like sketches), I did not know which ControlNet weights to use if appling to the image restoration task.
thanks
Yes, we keep the architecture of ControlNet unchanged and trained it from scratch on ImageNet1k.
Yes, we keep the architecture of ControlNet unchanged and trained it from scratch on ImageNet1k.
Got it!
May I ask another question. For Ablation study of "finetuning StableDiffusion v2", how the w/o finetuning model use input image as condition to guide the generation process? I see paper list 2 different paper, which confuses me.
Again, thanks for your answer!
Yes, we keep the architecture of ControlNet unchanged and trained it from scratch on ImageNet1k. @0x3f3f3f3fun @LokiXun Hi, may i ask a simple question: what does "train from scratch" mean? Does it means that the parallel module of Controlnet is initializing randomly instead of copying from pretrained stable diffusion?
@0x3f3f3f3fun Is there are model structure difference between LAControlNet and ControlNet? Can you convert LAControlNet to diffusers.
@jiaxiangc Did you convert to diffusers successful?