wgcfg: new package
@danderson this is I think entirely self-contained so shouldn't need much review.
@danderson this is I think entirely self-contained so shouldn't need much review.
Config semantics are important and this code seems pretty half-baked (there's a "TODO: this is broken, remove me" still in there). Reopening this.
Maintaining a code base does not mean committing stuff in a "throw it over the fence" manner. It means having a real attention to detail and care, which takes focus before committing.
I didn't want to have to comment on any of this and let you handle everything, but the quality here is questionable.
Please fix this stuff up.