Add recommended lints that are missing from the package

[dmiedev]

Hey,

I've noticed there are three lints that are recommended by Flutter team through the flutter_lints package but are missing from the very_good_analysis package:

• no_leading_underscores_for_library_prefixes
• no_leading_underscores_for_local_identifiers
• depend_on_referenced_packages

Could they get potentially added into the package? Or is there a reason they aren't included? They're pretty unharmful, from my point of view. Anyway, thanks in advance for considering my suggestion.

Cheers!

[wujekbogdan]

To keep this package in sync with original linter rules it might be a good idea to do:

include: package:flutter_lints/flutter.yaml

So that all base rules are always up to date with package:flutter_lints and package:lints (package:flutter_lints already includes lints). Then just add missing rules to linter.rules:

linter:
  rules:
   - very_good_rules

It might be also a good idea to mentions, somewhere in the docs, that very_good_analysis is a superset of package:flutter_lints/flutter.yaml.

I'm new to Flutter and it took me a while to understand what very_good_analysis really is. I wasn't sure whether it is an opinionated set of rules developed by Very Good Ventures or is it rather based on "original" linter rules. It turned out to be the latter.

I had to write a little script that does w diff on 2 rules sets to figure it out ;)