Björn Kautler
Björn Kautler
To add on that, it would be nice if not only SOCKS5 proxies would be supported, but also SOCKS4. As the standard JDK is capable of both, it probably shouldn't...
- `DD` and `YD` are officially deleted and can be re-assigned, so I'd not add them. - `QO`, `QU` and `ZZ` are user-assigned codes so could mean different things, so...
If not, maybe at least the name should change. :-) I think I just disable it here.
Let's try not to mix the issues, as I still see them as separate. I commented about the anchor in the other issue. This issue is about not needing the...
Don't get me wrong, I'm just looking at this from a blackbox view, I'm not in any way into the implementation of asciidoctor, subdocuments and macros. I'm just wondering, because...
> It's the policy of this processor to not hard fail by default. That's why we have the optional warning and the failure level setting. You can force it to...
Well, that wouldn't really help, would it? For the case of wrong IDs, the failure level would be `INFO` as you log that warning on info level, so the build...
@h3xstream you're not asking me, are you? I guess the basic problem is, why a `getClassName` call returns a method name. That sounds awfully wrong to me.
I have no idea whether this will cause false-positives
There are many possibilities. For example change the conventions, so that only portable characters are used in the patterns, or do not have the pattern in the name, but in...