No need for constexpr(?)

[FillePiano]

In Hazel/tree/master/Hazel/src/Hazel/Core/Base.h, is there really a need for constexpr. I do not think std::make_shared is constexprable... Am I wrong? I am a noob so would not surprise me.

[Kirdow]

If std::make_shared wasn't a constexpr I'm pretty sure the compiler would raise an error for that. So to me this looks like the correct use.

[Peanutt42]

The constexpr specifies that the compiler should inline this function, meaning that this:

Ref<T> test = CreateRef<T>();

gets inlined into this:

std::shared_ptr<T> test = std::make_shared<T>();