Inconsistent readme and test name conventions

[amichair]

The docs at https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/wiki/Development-Readme-Formats#framework-readmes link to https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/tree/master/frameworks/Java/revenj-jvm as an example of a readme, and running 'tfb --new' generates a readme template for new projects. In addition, to my understanding Gemini is the TE in-house framework, which one might assume can be used as a good example.

However, all three of these readme's have different structure and formatting, and also the test type names (both in the source links and the test url links) are different in all, e.g. 'Queries' vs 'QUERY' vs 'Variable Query Test' vs 'Multiple Queries' in the results page.

I would recommend that the type names, and readme format and structure should be made consistent at least across all of these 'official' sources, and once that's decided upon, it would be nice if it were possible at some point to retroactively fix the many existing project readme's to conform as well, if possible.