Swallowtail23

----- Message from ksuuk ***@***.***> ---------     Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 14:16:16 -0700     From: ksuuk ***@***.***> Reply-To: trusteddomainproject/OpenDMARC ***@***.***> Subject: [trusteddomainproject/OpenDMARC] v1.4.2 always crashes when message contains ARC-Seal headers. (Issue...

Interesting puzzle! First question is have you disabled DKIM **only** to test this SPF issue? OpenDMARC README file, "Dependencies": _Actual use requires... **some DKIM checking service that acts on messages...

I can't find it at the moment but I am sure I read that the OpenDMARC team were intending to move away from internal library SPF evaluation to rely on...

I found a comment on the old sourceforge site: https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/191/ - noting "as we have support for libspf2, the old internal SPF code should be removed and only the support...

> Hey there. You rang? Short version: at this point we mostly believe that the quality of the unit tests we've added and the enhancements we've made to the internal...

> RFC 4408 is SPF v1 > RFC 7208 is SPF v2 > libspf2 implements v2 Not officially. Some people refer to 4408 as v1 and 7208 as v2, but...

> > The DMARC RFC calls for an SPF check which is not conformant to either of the SPF RFCs, i.e. cannot strictly be used for SPF validation by itself,...

> c. If a trusted SPF header exists but is HELO only DMARC cannot use it and needs to run its own SPF check against MAIL FROM And this bit...

> @Swallowtail23 Note that SPF software is configurable. I am not aware of SPF milters that cannot be configured for the purposes of DMARC. > > I’m following the discussion...

smtp_line_length_limit is for *outbound* postfix configuration... http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_line_length_limit