Added schema for Item management
let me know what you think about this schema
Looks pretty good. Some remarks, I dont think we need both the userId and characterId. The inventory is part of the character.
Another thing but that is just my preference. I would shorten the "item_perk_one, item_perk_two, etc" to "perk0, perk1, perk2, etc"
It is probably necessary due to the possibility of having multiple characters associated with the same userID. But if the character ID is a primary key independent of the userID association, we can remove the need to validate the userID.
@Bakk-f4 could you wait for the alembic merge and generate the revision file ?
Example:
alembic revision --autogenerate -m "Added items table"