Vincent

Hi, Thanks for your answer. > The feature was meant for pages that would like to track fully without consent only. In that case it might be required to not...

Thanks @Chardonneaur, that's exactly the overall idea ! If i may add / specify a few points : - i didn't find clear occurrences on the CNIL website that UTMs...

Hi @mattab , Here are some examples of similar process's for other solutions. Note that i do not know how it technically works for the solution, i can only describe...

> Regarding > > > From my point of view, this issue looks very compatible with how visit-level custom dimensions work, so i assume the "easiest" way to solve this...

> this will result in extra tracking request for Cloud also Wouldn't be this quite light, as only the last hit (tag reference + date) would be stored ? Unlike...

> It's not so much the size of the request as it is adding new requests being sent to the server I was referring to the number of hits actually...

> If someone has 100 tags, and every day they indeed get 100 extra hits that adds up to 3000 extra hits per month. To me, that sounds reasonable for...

As a reference, it sounds like the "[Perimeters](https://community.commandersact.com/tagcommander/user-manual/container-management/rules/perimeters)" feature of Tag Commander (TMS from commander act).  The main point is to use and reuse some generic triggers for different...

Hi, That's good to know ! Can we also hope for (with the perspective of Tarteaucitron being compatibility with Server Side tracking) : * being able to push the consent...