Stefan du Fresne
Stefan du Fresne
Sounds like a nice change to do at some point
There are cons to client-side migration as well unfortunately. - If migrations only run on the server side it may be possible to get new app code replicated to you...
OK so @garethbowen and I had a chatty chat. Here is the current apogee of our collective thought, intermingled with my post collective thought confusion: - Client-side migrations probably do...
re: conflicts in general Our managing of conflicts remains the same before and after this change, and your scenario above plays out identically (in terms of conflicts) with the current...
NB: in general I'd say we'd simply avoid doing this by not having massive migrations. However, it is likely that the flexible hierarchy work (#3639) will force us to migrate...
(Up for discussion, but IMO unless @garethbowen is super duper sure we could leave this until we're sure that flexible hierarchy requires it)
@garethbowen I agree with this. FWIW I think this is a complex enough problem that we don't have time to solve it before 2019 anyhow, given other priorities.
https://github.com/maharmstone/btrfs?tab=readme-ov-file#installation
Apologies if this is dealt with in another ticket, but we should also paginate this page. If you go onto a partner that has a reasonable number of users this...
Any work on this ticket should be charged to: `117 I-TECH-Zimbabwe`