Roblox
Removed duplicates of debug.info()
Changes
I ran into the debug.info() thing 3 times while scrolling. This should fix it. One of the duplicates had a different code sample that the other two, so I cut and pasted it into the one debug.info() that I made.
Checks
By submitting your pull request for review, you agree to the following:
- [x] This contribution was created in whole or in part by me, and I have the right to submit it under the terms of this repository's open source licenses.
- [x] I understand and agree that this contribution and a record of it are public, maintained indefinitely, and may be redistributed under the terms of this repository's open source licenses.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, all proposed changes are accurate.
Admitted that this is a bit unclear, but it's a factor of how library functions are output to docs. The three different "variations" of debug.info() are shown since they each expect a different set of parameters... note that it's either level, options OR function, options OR thread, level, options. So each of these is documented separately. Open to cleaning up aspects of each if necessary, but we'd prefer to keep all 3 variations.
This pull request has been inactive for 14 days. If there's no activity in the next 7 days, it will be automatically closed. To keep it open, please comment or push new commits. Alternatively, add the label do-not-close to exempt it from auto-closing. 🫡 🙏
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
How does this look? I basically consolidated the three debug.info() blocks into one, and noted that it can be done in three different ways. Did the same for the two debug.traceback() blocks as well.
Hi @ExtremePro11299, thank you for your contribution! I appreciate the effort to clean up duplicate entries — the intent makes perfect sense.
Unfortunately, we'll need to revert this change for now. The current system relies on those duplicates to render documentation for overloaded functions in the Script Editor. We know this isn't ideal, and we're looking into ways to improve how these duplicates are navigated and displayed on the docs site.
Thanks again for taking the time to improve the docs — we value your contributions!
