RandomGamingDev
This repository is cringe
This came to my attention and this is one of the cringerier cope clones I have ever seen.
Lmao thanks ig. So ur the og Creator of copenheimer? Cool. Could u tell me how u came up with the idea and what your thoughts are on my reverse engineered version? Also, I'm not sure what u mean by "cringe", but this repo's designed more so for ease of use, educational purposes, and as a simple proof of concept rather than as an actual scanning software which is why it's not that fast, nor has a system for external nor automatic range handling or division to threads, although I do have plans to improve it in the future when I stop procrastinating. :D
This came to my attention and this is one of the cringerier cope clones I have ever seen.
its come to my attention that i screwed ur mom last night
Lmao thanks ig. So ur the og Creator of copenheimer? Cool. Could u tell me how u came up with the idea and what your thoughts are on my reverse engineered version? Also, I'm not sure what u mean by "cringe", but this repo's designed more so for ease of use, educational purposes, and as a simple proof of concept rather than as an actual scanning software which is why it's not that fast, nor has a system for external nor automatic range handling or division to threads, although I do have plans to improve it in the future when I stop procrastinating. :D
Your repository is literally integrated into Wurst, not yours specifically, but someone else's who is likely more intelligent than you to think this is even remotely close to Copenheimer.
Lmao thanks ig. So ur the og Creator of copenheimer? Cool. Could u tell me how u came up with the idea and what your thoughts are on my reverse engineered version? Also, I'm not sure what u mean by "cringe", but this repo's designed more so for ease of use, educational purposes, and as a simple proof of concept rather than as an actual scanning software which is why it's not that fast, nor has a system for external nor automatic range handling or division to threads, although I do have plans to improve it in the future when I stop procrastinating. :D
You'r repo is quite litteraly integrated into wurst not yours specifically but someone else's who is likely more intelligent then you are to think this is even remotely close to Copenheimer
- Grammar???
- When did I ever say that this was made to be the same thing as Copenheimer? I explicitly state in the video and github that this is an educational tool (that's why it's designed in python in a way that's easily comprehensible instead of just using smth like masscan) and that I don't want people nuking servers.
Lmao thanks ig. So ur the og Creator of copenheimer? Cool. Could u tell me how u came up with the idea and what your thoughts are on my reverse engineered version? Also, I'm not sure what u mean by "cringe", but this repo's designed more so for ease of use, educational purposes, and as a simple proof of concept rather than as an actual scanning software which is why it's not that fast, nor has a system for external nor automatic range handling or division to threads, although I do have plans to improve it in the future when I stop procrastinating. :D
You'r repo is quite litteraly integrated into wurst not yours specifically but someone else's who is likely more intelligent then you are to think this is even remotely close to Copenheimer
- Grammar???
- When did I ever say that this was made to be the same thing as Copenheimer? I explicitly state in the video and github that this is an educational tool (that's why it's designed in python in a way that's easily comprehensible instead of just using smth like masscan) and that I don't want people nuking servers.
This 'educational' claim is crazy. Do you really believe anyone would use this for educational purposes? Why would you recreate something used for nuking servers and expect people not to misuse it? Are you out of your mind?
And I apologize if my grammar was not up to your standards. Criticizing '1 grammar' is absurd. Compared to me, you are insignificant. I didn't have time to correct myself because, unlike you, I have significant responsibilities in this world.
^^
Lmao thanks ig. So ur the og Creator of copenheimer? Cool. Could u tell me how u came up with the idea and what your thoughts are on my reverse engineered version? Also, I'm not sure what u mean by "cringe", but this repo's designed more so for ease of use, educational purposes, and as a simple proof of concept rather than as an actual scanning software which is why it's not that fast, nor has a system for external nor automatic range handling or division to threads, although I do have plans to improve it in the future when I stop procrastinating. :D
You'r repo is quite litteraly integrated into wurst not yours specifically but someone else's who is likely more intelligent then you are to think this is even remotely close to Copenheimer
- Grammar???
- When did I ever say that this was made to be the same thing as Copenheimer? I explicitly state in the video and github that this is an educational tool (that's why it's designed in python in a way that's easily comprehensible instead of just using smth like masscan) and that I don't want people nuking servers.
This 'educational' claim is crazy. Do you really believe anyone would use this for educational purposes? Why would you recreate something used for nuking servers and expect people not to misuse it? Are you out of your mind?
Creating or modelling a simplified example of something to teach about something is common practice. For instance, those teaching swordsmanship have wooden swords, those teaching how to make bullet proof materials teach a basic model for how guns work, and those teaching cybersecurity create a simplified overview, or actual piece of simplified malware. Yes, you can bash in someone's head with a wooden sword, yes you can create a zip gun to attack people with with an understanding of a simplified gun, and yes you can hack people with a piece of simplified malware. Is that the purpose, or intent of the tool though? No, and if you say otherwise we'll both know you're lying. Should these tools, then, just because of their danger be outlawed? No. It's just an example used for demonstration, which I've used for demonstrating how these things work not only through github and youtube, but with other people in real life as well.
And I apologize if my grammar was not up to your standards. Criticizing '1 grammar' is absurd. Compared to me, you are insignificant. I didn't have time to correct myself because, unlike you, I have significant responsibilities in this world.
^^
Let's be honest, the only reason I complained about your grammar was that it's near incomprehensible. I don't care about grammar much and make a ton of mistakes myself, but at least make what you say readable. Also, attacking me personally? Ad hominem.
Seriously, you think you’ve done something big with this repo? 😂 Even one of the main devs of Copenheimer is calling you out. 💀
I never said I was doing anything big with the repo? So far multiple of your arguments have been the literal definition of a straw man fallacy. Also, the reason he called my repo cringe is likely the fact that this is an educational tool designed for simplicity of understanding instead of speed (this example is written in python with 3 common python libraries, isn't even asked to be run in something like pypy, and if I wanted something fast and damaging I could've just used massscan + filter which would've been multitudes of times easier), which is different from what his version and multiple other Copenheimer clones were designed for: aiming to be fast and to be able to cause damage.
This entire issue is cringe, you guys are arguing about a Minecraft tool. Someone close it and move on.
This entire issue is cringe, you guys are arguing about a Minecraft tool. Someone close it and move on.
Yeah, agreed. I wanted to leave it here as a joke, but it'll probably attract more people like @FFUV so I'll close it.