QimingFlex

Thanks for the detailed explanation and guidance @momchil-flex. I'll start with the pydantic validators and consult Damian. Your approach to simulations and data transformations is clear and helpful!

Hi @momchil-flex , I just updated the revision. After some thought, I believe it's better to conduct near-to-far in the x-y plane for the following reasons: 1. This conforms to...

> > Thank you for the comments, @momchil-flex ! To achieve that goal for a general case, I'm considering how to modify the monitor if we allow 0-dim for every...

> What's the status of this PR? is it for 2.7? @QimingFlex @weiliangjin2021 It still needs some time to be finished. I'm not sure if it is for 2.7, any...

Hi @momchil-flex , I tested the step size recommended by the 2D CFL condition for a 2D cavity. The solution is stable and does not diverge after long simulation (1...

I understand that the source and monitor should take non-zero values along a 0-sized dimension, but the simulation size should be exactly zero along this dimension. However, if I set...

@momchil-flex I've fixed the code for a general 2D farfield projection and tested it with RCS for all three scenarios in 2d. For a 0-dim along the x-direction, users should...

> I feel like to avoid confusion we shouldn't merge this before we also fix the server-side projections. Those are much more commonly used anyway. @dmarek-flex now has very good...

@momchil-flex I added validators in the frontend. With this fix, users can compute far field components Ephi, Etheta, Hphi, and Htheta in 2D. There are two remaining tasks for a...

Hi @momchil-flex So far, we have fixed the FieldAngleProjectionMonitor for both frontend and backend with far-field approximation. For the remaining work, I propose the following: 1. Updates to Cartesian space...