Questions for BSM2 module
Documenting questions related to implementing the BSM2 configuration in EXPOsan: https://github.com/QSD-Group/EXPOsan/tree/bsm2/exposan/bsm2
Tables, etc. below refer to the BSM2 report if not otherwise noted: http://iwa-mia.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/TR3_BSM_TG_Tech_Report_no_3_BSM2_General_Description.pdf
ADM/Anaerobic Digester
- [ ] Need to figure out where all the parameters in Tables 5-8 are set for
adm1/AnaerobicCSTR
Primary Clarifier
- [ ] Need to figure out where f_X and f_XS are set
- [ ] Not sure why HRT is set, rather than V
@joyxyz1994
Currently the ASM2ADM and ADM2ASM junctions work about right, still minor differences in some components but largely match the results.
After providing some initial conditions the system can miraculously run, but the results are awfully wrong...
Would you be able to join the office hour today? If no one shows up, we can work on this together.
@joyxyz1994
Currently the
ASM2ADMandADM2ASMjunctions work about right, still minor differences in some components but largely match the results.After providing some initial conditions the system can miraculously run, but the results are awfully wrong...
yep that's my plan, thanks & talk to you later!
Would you be able to join the office hour today? If no one shows up, we can work on this together.
@joyxyz1994 I tried to run the test for the bsm2 module but it didn't pass... which branches of QSDsan/EXPOsan should I be using?
If you've gotten the results close enough to the matlab model, can you send in a PR to merge into main? Thanks!
I used qsdsan@metro-bsm2 and exposan@bsm2. The maximum relative error I got was around 0.018. I didn't merge because I haven't checked the other sludge treatment units that Saumitra developed yet. Would you prefer we merge anyway?
Ah if that's the case let's wait till that's figured out - I just realized that we need to merge in the updates in @.***
I'll rerun the tests locally, I thought I was using the exact same branches as you and I pulled in the recent changes....
From: Xinyi Joy Zhang @.> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 6:00 PM To: QSD-Group/EXPOsan @.> Cc: Yalin @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [QSD-Group/EXPOsan] Questions for BSM2 module (Issue #44)
I used @.*** and @.*** The maximum relative error I got was around 0.018. I didn't merge because I haven't checked the other sludge treatment units that Saumitra developed yet. Would you prefer we merge anyway?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/QSD-Group/EXPOsan/issues/44#issuecomment-2087498224, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALV5VLL2JHXDGIFXOODT2DTZAAH6RAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7IE6GOCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBXGQ4TQMRSGQ. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Losing track on this issue... but seems like @joyxyz1994 you've finished and merged in bsm2?
ahh yes, we can close this issue now