PyEllips
Joss paper
Hey @MarJMue,
I started to write some text for the paper. I'll just create this as a PR to enable easier commenting and reviewing of changes. However, I think we're not supposed to merge this in the end (and I would also argue against it).
@MarJMue I worked a bit on the introductory part and I am quite happy with it. Do you like to have a look and see if you are fine with it, too?
I also added a basic example for building a simple model, to give readers a feeling for how building a model looks like. I would add a bit of text around this in a few days.
Other than that I just think that the Statement of need and Software with similar functionalities need some refinement, but then we should be able to hand this in. What do you think?
Hey @domna, I have worked in Sangam's suggestions and I suppose we have everything good to go. If you have some time, you may have a last read, and then we can finally hand it in.
One thing is odd, your name still gets our affiliations even tho it is not set in the file. I have not found a way to fix this. If you have no idea, we might have to ask the editor for help.
Thank you for the update! I went through it and have some small remarks. Mainly concerning the FAIRmat part. We might leave this out since I don't know whether this is still compatible. Otherwise it's good to go from my side.
One thing is odd, your name still gets our affiliations even tho it is not set in the file. I have not found a way to fix this. If you have no idea, we might have to ask the editor for help.
I think it might to try to set something if there is nothing specified. Anyways, I talked to Sangam and we agreed that it's fine if I still use the Gießen affiliation (since I don't know what to use otherwise).