Part-DB
Problem with update on DOCKER from 1.15.1 to 1.16.1
I have PART-DB version 1.15.1 running in a Docker Container Station on my QNAP. I decided to update it to the latest version, 1.16.1.
To do this, I ran the following command:
docker pull jbtronics/part-db1:latest
Container Station downloaded the latest image (1.16.1), but after restarting the container, nothing changed. The PART-DB version remains the same as before the update.
At first, I thought I had broken something and asked my colleague to check the update on his QNAP Container Station. After testing, he got the same result. This raises the question: are we doing something wrong? Or is it some kind of issue with the Docker images?
Have you somehow mapped the var/cache folder of part-DB to a folder or a volume? Are you sure that you are acutally seeing the output of the correct docker container?
The docker images, itself should be fine.
Hello Jan. He is 100% sure about his volume configuration in Docker. I have done many tests. I even ran a test version of Docker to find the cause of the problem.
So, I first ran Docker in the test version with the Part-DB 1.5.1 image and tried to upgrade it to version 1.15.1.
docker pull jbtronics/part-db1:v1.15.2
Unfortunately, the automatic update of the image to 1.5.2 had no effect. The image was downloaded correctly, and Docker itself started without any issues after the update. However, Part-DB still displayed version 1.5.1.
I searched for a solution for a long time. In the end, I was only able to fix the problem when I manually changed the directory name.
/Container/container-station-data/lib/docker/volumes/part-db-test_html/_data
and created a new empty directory
_data
Then, I executed the "Recreate" command in Docker. After restarting Docker, the Part-DB version was successfully updated to the newer version. It's not the most elegant solution, but it works.
This way, I managed to update Part-DB step by step to the latest version, 1.16.1.
I’m not an expert in creating Docker images, but it seems to me that this is some kind of issue with the image itself. I have conducted many tests and also asked a colleague to run tests in his test environment. He encountered exactly the same problems as I did.
If needed, I can test Docker images for you 😊