PeerReview Process improvements

[Darynarli]

Description of the issue

During testing of the review process, some errors were found, and ideas were also generated on how to make the review process clearer and easier for users.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Change the functionality of the "Deny" button
2. Comments on an accepted field
3. Peer Review "delete" button
4. Bugs on Summary Tab
5. Modifying an accepted field
6. Modifying "Start Peer Review" button
7. Comments on an rejected field

Ideas of solution

1. Change the functionality of the "Deny" button:
   • "Deny" will mean deleting a field: after a reviewer suggests deleting a field, the contributor can accept the deletion, and the field will be removed from the metadata.
2. Comments on an accepted field:
   • Fix the issue with comments on a field that the reviewer/contributor initially rejected/suggested changes to, but later accepted before submission. The comments suggested by the user before the field's acceptance are being displayed.
3. Peer Review “delete” button:
   • Add a button for deleting Peer Review on the profile page in open review processes, which will completely remove the current review progress and allow another reviewer to start reviewing the metadata anew.
4. Summary tab:
   • Fix the bug related to the display of the field name (currently not displayed).
   • After the first submit, reviewed fields where I suggested changes or rejected are shown as missing on the contr page. Empty fields on the contributor page are shown twice (with the status empty&missing)
   • Fix the bug that causes the same field to be displayed twice.
   • Fix the bug related to the display in category accepted the fields that have rejected state on contributor page.
   • Add new field "suggested value".
5. Modifying an accepted field:
   • Once a field has been accepted, it cannot be modified, meaning changes or rejections cannot be suggested before submission without refreshing the page.
6. "Start Peer Review" button:
   • Add checking of metadata before starting peer review. For empty metadata reviewing is disable.
7. Comments on an rejected field:
   • Fix the bug with comments on a field that the reviewer rejected. The comments suggested by the user before the field's acceptance are being displayed.

Context and Environment

• Version used:
• Operating system:
• Environment setup and (python) version:

Workflow checklist

• [x] I am aware of the workflow in CONTRIBUTING.md