refactor: update Django to 4.2 LTS

[NtskwK]

What's new

Django 4.2:

Django 4.2 supports PostgreSQL 12 and highe

django.conf.urls.url() is removed.

django.utils.encoding.force_text() and are removed.smart_text()

PostgreSQL JSONField is deprecated

Activate the postgis_raster extension with Django.

Docker-compose:

remove Version top-level element (obsolete)

Docker

set ENV with = (e.g. ENV VAR=xxx)

Others

PostGIS Support Matrix: https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/UsersWikiPostgreSQLPostGIS

unfix:

djangorestframework-simplejwt (Critical)

there are also many different from django-rest-framework-jwt to djangorestframework-simplejwt. ~~So it can not pass the test in webodm.sh.~~ Login function is broken now. The browser will create window.prompt automatic which is required account and password to instead of the login function. It's necessary to overwrite auth functions.

django-webpack-loader

There is a bug(?) in static template at v1.0.0 or higher version.

Error during template rendering In template /mnt/d/Program/gitwork/WebODM/app/templates/app/base.html

rio-tiler

RioTilerBaseModel:warn 'key' access will has been deprecated and will be removed in rio-tiler 7.0."

webpack

• (node:5096) [DEP_WEBPACK_DEPRECATION_ARRAY_TO_SET] DeprecationWarning: Compilation.chunks was changed from Array to Set (using Array method 'map' is deprecated)

• (node:5096) [DEP0040] DeprecationWarning: The punycode module is deprecated. Please use a userland alternative instead. (Use node --trace-deprecation ... to show where the warning was created)

• WARNING in webpack performance recommendations: webapp | You can limit the size of your bundles by using import() or require.ensure to lazy load some parts of your application.

Docker-compose

Maintainer tag is deprecated

[NtskwK]

@pierotofy #1471 #1543

[pierotofy]

I appreciate the efforts to upgrade Django, Postgres and base system, but there's a lot that needs to be addressed.

My comments from https://github.com/OpenDroneMap/WebODM/pull/1543#issuecomment-2297562263 still haven't been addressed and I don't understand why this was marked as "ready for review".

This is not an easy task and there's a reason it hasn't been done yet; it's a lot of work and needs a solid amount of funding (or a lot of careful work by a dedicated contributor) to be done.