[BUG] [Elm] Outputs duplicate types, as well as overlapping types with same name
Bug Report Checklist
- [X] Have you provided a full/minimal spec to reproduce the issue?
-
Using the full Stripe API spec.
- [X] Have you validated the input using an OpenAPI validator (example)?
-
I used the CLI with
validateand it found no issues. - [x] Have you tested with the latest master to confirm the issue still exists?
-
Yes
- [X] Have you searched for related issues/PRs?
- [X] What's the actual output vs expected output?
Description
openapi-generator version
Latest master
OpenAPI declaration file content or url
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stripe/openapi/master/openapi/spec3.json
Generation Details
java -jar modules/openapi-generator-cli/target/openapi-generator-cli.jar generate -i https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stripe/openapi/master/openapi/spec3.json -g elm -o ./elm-stripeFix
All in the same file, there will be this Status:
type Status
= StatusActive
| StatusBlocked
| StatusInactive
statusVariants : List Status
statusVariants =
[ StatusActive
, StatusBlocked
, StatusInactive
]
stringFromStatus : Status -> String
stringFromStatus model =
case model of
StatusActive ->
"active"
StatusBlocked ->
"blocked"
StatusInactive ->
"inactive"
...right along with this Status somewhere else:
type Status
= StatusExpired
| StatusLost
| StatusSubmitted
| StatusUnsubmitted
| StatusWon
statusVariants : List Status
statusVariants =
[ StatusExpired
, StatusLost
, StatusSubmitted
, StatusUnsubmitted
, StatusWon
]
stringFromStatus : Status -> String
stringFromStatus model =
case model of
StatusExpired ->
"expired"
StatusLost ->
"lost"
StatusSubmitted ->
"submitted"
StatusUnsubmitted ->
"unsubmitted"
StatusWon ->
"won"
Obviously this causes a conflict, and fixing it is not trivial as all references to Status are now ambiguous.
Suggest a fix
Ideally, have types belonging to different domains go in separate type modules.
At the least, add a number or underscore to the end of one of them if need be.
Naive fix would be to merge the enums and just treat them as one.
Also, this includes totally identical types and encoder/decoders. They can have everything exactly the same, and still be repeated 5 different places in the file.