TAPI
TAPI copied to clipboard
Extensibility and UML lifecycleState stereotype for the LayerProtocolName enumeration
It seems that this enumeration should be extensible to allow control of new layer protocols not yet defined: see open issue #264
As discussed in open issues #267 and #268 , this enumeration is not fully stable.
However, some values are stable and mature (e.g., ODU and ETH).
Is there a way to qualify different maturity levels for different values of this Enumeration?