OpenCRE
OpenCRE copied to clipboard
### **What is the issue?** The [explorer](https://opencre.org/explorer) could be improved to have more similar data and functionality to the original. ### Expected Behaviour The original CRE explorer [here](https://zeljkoobrenovic.github.io/opencre-explorer/) displays tags...
[Ticket](https://github.com/OWASP/OpenCRE/issues/502) This PR updates the style and content of the main navigation. **Changes**: - add a new main nav link: "Browse" - style the header and show it on the...
closes #479 TODO: - [ ] make spreadsheet_parsers.parse_export_format() return the same format as parse_hierarchical_export_format() - [ ] add parse_export_format test case to test_parse_standards_from_spreadsheeet - [x] make base "importer" class that...
Home page: -Make it just like every page. So not title. Just tabs at the top: OpenCRE, OpenCRE-chat, Map analyis and then the search bar on the right -Add a...
## Issue ### **What is the issue?** CycloneDX supports attestations. This is their way to do standards and they have native CRE support in their attestations. Time for us to...
## Issue improve the[ CRE graph](https://www.opencre.org/explorer/force_graph) visuals by making them as responsive and cool as [the originals ](https://zeljkoobrenovic.github.io/opencre-explorer/visuals/force-graph-3d-all.html)
## Issue both the original explorer and the cre version do not show WHY the graph is the shape it is, for the sake of debugging we should be albe...
### Numpy and Python version mismatch Numpy 1.23 does not support python 3.11 so when running `pip install -r requirements.txt` the process fails. Docs: https://numpy.org/devdocs/release/1.23.1-notes.htmlhttps://numpy.org/devdocs/release/1.23.1-notes.html (the 1.23.0 notes don't mention...
## Issue ### **What is the issue?** If we need any data changes it can only be done by the developers, is complicated and it takes a very long amount...
Line 32 in the README should possibly have "When?" as a heading, but "When?" is followed by a seemingly unrelated comment about the data. Perhaps the "When?" should just be...