FORT-validator icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
FORT-validator copied to clipboard

RPKI cache validator

Results 53 FORT-validator issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

I am having an issue fort status as below Does any one knows how to clear this issue? Though RPKI session with router is shown as established even with this...

Support

Hello, Do you have any idea how can i solve the below issue. I am using Ubuntu, followed the official documentation but it returned the error that the IP can...

Support

hi, i'm having issue when using fort, route validate as invalid. fort record show different as whois database to. any help? tq

Support

[Mistake](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/commit/aaae3c484a82075ef1e3186c511cc34e9e31ea1a#diff-18a94ea3e331a8634fe3fd18bef5b238f8a8d72d517226aebde53021fa25ac29). FORT is not 100% [RFC 6486](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6486) compliant. Having a certain degree of tolerance to missing, invalid or stale manifests involves a significantly more elaborate framework than a flag that...

Urgency: Critical

Just a wish. Probably low priority. Experience has shown that clients often don't clearly report [No Data Available (yet)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8210#section-12), so this tends to confuse users: First validation cycle has begun,...

Urgency: Low

Hello, I believe a reload feature to be able to trigger revalidation and SLURM reread on SIGHUP would be nice to have, without daemon restart, RTR session teardown and RTR...

Urgency: Low

Hello, I'm currently evaluating the FORT validator and have a few questions. I'm concerned about bugs, misconfigurations or other issues (in all RP/RTR setups, not specific to FORT) that will...

Urgency: Low

So people can turn off these validations in a pinch, assuming the consequences are understood. Several incidences are [already defined](https://nicmx.github.io/FORT-validator/incidence.html), but it sucks that I'm adding them in a reactive...

Urgency: Medium

[draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis/). But probably not in the immediate future, because since [BGPsec is still axed](https://github.com/NICMx/FORT-validator/issues/58#issuecomment-941977925), Fort's RTRv1 is a joke.

Urgency: Very High

Ghostbusters are vCards. Fort has Ghostbusters checks (RFC 6493), but not the more generic vCard checks (6350). This probably shouldn't be given too much priority, because Ghostbusters don't affect RTR...

Urgency: Low