MichaIng

Would break backwards-compatibility with Python 2, of course. But as of Python 2 deprecation it's probably not worth the effort to keep backwards compatibility. But I guess some testing and/or...

Probably in combination with `--verbose`/`-v` flag only?

Somehow similar to #259. What you call "tag" here, is the link text `text`. I wonder if this is a generic enough component to base an include/exclude option on, as...

CSS selector syntax would be awesome indeed. But I wouldn't want to put to burden onto the devs for implementing such a complex parser, so I guess it depends on...

But is it really the link _text_ that you want to match against? I mean to you have a lot of "Read more" links, and need to check those exclusively?...

@T145 Did you try it? In `[link](mylink)`, `link` is the link text. The concept of a "tag" doesn't really exist in Markdown: - `[link](mylink)` => [link](mylink) In the translated HTML...

I'm quite sure that Markdown is not converted by `lychee` (correct me if I'm wrong) and it is good that it does not even try it, as Markdown as mentioned...

Probably it can depend on whether STDOUT is a terminal or not, so show the summary by default, when it is a terminal, hence most likely an interactive call, and...

Jep, through about that, then moving output for each checked link to next verbosity level `-vv`, but somehow a summary behind a verbose flag feels wrong. Especially on interactive calls...

I personally check links in Markdown only after building the HTML pages from it. But I agree it should be made clear, when adding such an option, that it can...