Lakens
add more casual language interpretation of results
... we can conclude that the observed effect is statistically not different from zero and statistically equivalent to unsubstantial.
proposed by Anne Pier
By Dorothy Bishop
I did wonder also about the TOSTER wording: Based on the equivalence test and the null-hypothesis test combined, we can conclude that the observed effect is statistically different from zero and statistically equivalent to zero. It does seem a bit like Schrödinger's cat. I wondered about rewording such as: Based on the equivalence test and the null-hypothesis test combined, we can conclude that the observed effect is statistically different from zero but falls within the bounds that indicate the difference from zero is not meaningful.
