JaredC01

> I guess my question is referring the the statement above. > > > > " CW2 styled Galileo Clockwork 1" > > > > Can i assume 1.0/1.5 internals...

> @JaredC01 do you have any estimation when the Galileo update will be available? I'm close to finishing the mechanics of my V2.4 build and am currently considering waiting for...

> @JaredC01 > > > > Hi Jared. I'm curious if you felt the Galileo 1 had improved flexible handling over the orbiter 1.5? In a similar vein, do you...

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLUDLJQXZeU&ab_channel=MisadventuresinMeltingPlastic > > 23:33 > > Drop? Nah, that's still Galileo 1, it's just got a reworked rear plate to fit the CW2 carriage. Galileo 2 Extruder is getting...

Different applications will require different lengths, and as there's no "standard" configuration, there's no standard PTFE length. ChaosBlades is correct though, the hole is 6mm deep in the G2SA body.

Beta parts should NOT be used at this point, as there have been changes to the front body that make those parts incompatible with release G2E. There are versions based...

When G2Z is out of beta, it will (per the big bold message on the readme page).

Everything has been adjusted in one way or another. It warrants a reprint if you're questioning that.

No, the kits are pretty well solidified at this point. The only thing of note is that there will be a 2mm drill bit included in future kits to assist...

As ChaosBlades implies, there's less overall grip with G2, though tension also makes a difference, and your assembly of the extruder makes a difference (especially if you don't align the...