Feat: PIM factories (restricted and immutable)

[fabianschu]

This PR consolidates the efforts on the two PIM factories:

• it removes the outdated generalized factory
• it adds the restricted factory (Qacc use case)
• it adds the immutable factory (coin launcher use case)

[fabianschu]

Open questions for me at this point:

Restricted PIM Factory:

• right now all privileges that exist go to the address that is set as initialAdmin
• this comprises:
  • being workflow admin (1)
  • receiving initialIssuanceSupply (2)
  • being token owner for issuance token (3)
  • receiving CURVE_INTERACTION_ROLE (4)

However, I learned this might not be ideal for qacc, since the participating projects won't be orchestrator admins. Would it make sense to make a "split" between (1) and (2,3,4)? So the user passes another address to the factory that receives privileges (2,3,4) while the address passed as initialAdmin "only" receives privilege (1)? @0xNuggan

[fabianschu]

I addressed your comments @marvinkruse. In addition to that I had to make some additional changes to cater for qacc specific needs:

• the restricted factory now contains a pre-funding mechanism where anyone can sponsor the initial collateral supply required for the deployment of a PIM workflow (sponsor can also withdraw their pre-funding again)
• to be able to use pre-funding, deployer needs to set sponsor as workflow admin
• initial issuance supply goes to deployer
• curve interaction role also goes to deployer

Note: fee claim for deployer is planned to be enabled through admin's Multisig via Zodiac Roles

[marvinkruse]

@fabianschu Overall looks good to me, one thing I just noticed though: we want to deploy the factories any time a testnet deployment goes through, potentially even with every deployment (but I'm not sure about that last part). Two things come to mind there: (a) it should be included in the TestnetDeploymentScript to automatically just deploy both factories and (b) for that it would probably be cool to have not just a run() function in the DeployWorkflowSpecificFactory.s.sol but also a run(orchestratorFactory, trustedForwarder, factoryType)` or something like that - if that makes sense?

[fabianschu]

Will be split into multiple PRs