IETS3
Feature/improve value inspector
Looks good to me, just one question: why did you remove and readd the InlineAll intention under inlineAll2 name?
Because there was a problem with this intention - so it looked. In my desparation, I reimplemented it. But the problem was a different one.
Because there was a problem with this intention - so it looked. In my desparation, I reimplemented it. But the problem was a different one.
Does it make sense for me to have a look what could be that problem? Because the new intention looks exactly the same as the old one, except for child filter. If not, we can then at least give it the old name, cause having only single one inlineAll2 intention looks strange for later reviews.