feat: LEAP-1351: LSF customization for bulk annotation
This PR adds
-
"annotation:bulk"interface that allows to hide all panels and elements that can't be set equally to group of annotaions - ability to customize control buttons and an interface
"controls:custom"indicating that we are going to take control on rendere of these buttons - fix the way we deliver config in cypress tests
PR fulfills these requirements
- [x] Commit message(s) and PR title follows the format
[fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change madeex.fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors - [x] Tests for the changes have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
- [ ] Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
- [x] Best efforts were made to ensure docs/code are concise and coherent (checked for spelling/grammatical errors, commented out code, debug logs etc.)
- [x] Self-reviewed and ran all changes on a local instance (for bug fixes/features)
Change has impacts in these area(s)
- [ ] Product design
- [ ] Backend (Database)
- [ ] Backend (API)
- [x] Frontend
What feature flags were used to cover this change?
fflag_feat_all_leap_1181_bulk_annotation_short
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes, and covered entirely by feature flag(s)
- [ ] Yes, and covered partially by feature flag(s)
- [x] No
- [ ] Not sure (briefly explain the situation below)
What level of testing was included in the change?
(check all that apply)
- [ ] e2e
- [x] integration
- [ ] unit
Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?
Editor, BottomBar
Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | a7f7edafff41b04b363625377133741d07df6024 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/674fe056e3da8e0008b2f9c0 |
Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | a7f7edafff41b04b363625377133741d07df6024 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/674fe05640e7690008e70031 |
Would not it be better to name interface "annotation:bulk"? That will keep it in a shape of namespace:detail like for lot of other interfaces. I know they are a mess but that's a really lowcost change on an early stage with small benefit
/git merge develop
Workflow run Successfully merged: 387 files changed, 6483 insertions(+), 9039 deletions(-)
/git merge develop
Workflow run Successfully merged: 29 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.
This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 10 days with no activity.
/git merge develop
Workflow run Successfully merged: 29 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
/git merge develop
Workflow run Successfully merged: 12 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)