Nathan Ridge
Nathan Ridge
In my experience, the best way to resolve issues about standard library headers not being found is to use `--query-driver` as discussed in https://clangd.llvm.org/troubleshooting#cant-find-standard-library-headers-map-stdioh-etc.
Compile command extractor fails when presented a triple that LLVM itself supports but Clang does not
You should be able to avoid the automatic addition of a target triple by adding your own `--target` flag with https://clangd.llvm.org/config.html#add. As for whether the underlying issue (the target being...
Compile command extractor fails when presented a triple that LLVM itself supports but Clang does not
> I can specify a custom target that way, but if I do the system include extractor will pass it to the actual cross compiler [...] Yeah, that's an unfortunate...
Compile command extractor fails when presented a triple that LLVM itself supports but Clang does not
> > For some background, that was added in [llvm/llvm-project#65824](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65824) > > lol, I've been foiled by my own pull request. Hah! I failed to make that connection :laughing: >...
Could you provide some motivation for this? Do you expect to take advantage of the config file's ability to specify different values of the option for different files/directories in a...
We have a recent example of something similar in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111322: the command-line option `--function-arg-placeholders` was expanded into a new `ArgumentLists` config key under `Completion`. It took a bit of futzing...
clangd is a clang-based tool so its support, in terms of things like targets and cpus, is generally determined by what clang supports. The general procedure is: * figure out...
> why wouldn't clangd use those flags, nevertheless clang doesn't recognize them, for queries for query driver in order to extract more information about compiler's toolchain? Good question! Clangd only...
https://neovim.io/doc/user/lsp.html#vim.lsp.buf.implementation() should accomplish this
> So, can we speed the process of building preamble by multi-core? I'm not aware of any prior art for parsing a single C++ translation unit in parallel. The rules...